Sunday, 9 April 2017

The Ballot or the Bullet by Malcolm X



The provided text was an extract from “The Ballot or the Bullet”; of which was a speech delivered by Malcolm X on the third of April in 1964, and has since then become one of the most empowering speeches in American history. Thousands of people turned up to hear the activist Malcolm X present, what can be identified as a political speech as it exemplifies the use of rhetorical devices, figurative techniques such as alliteration, analogies and more, references to real world events, as well as appeals to particular needs. The aforementioned conventions of the political speech were heavily utilised by Malcolm X, which to evoke a sense of urgency in his audience and to call them to action in order to reclaim civil rights.


When this speech was given, it mainly targeted African Americans. However, it is multivocal as it somewhat targets the American Political system as well; this speech embodied the activists’ urgency in cultivating his audience and promoting black nationalism, as Malcolm X was a black civil rights activist who had significant influence during the civil rights movement in the mid 20th century. At the time African Americans were limited to making their own decisions on who to vote for due to the impositions and forcefulness that the white politicians projected towards black neighbourhoods in America.  It can be deduced from the speech’s subject of black nationalism that this speech calls for its audience to take a step and fight for their rights and to do so by voting for whom they deemed most supportive of their rights in the United States election.


Furthermore, it is evident in the use of the slogan "The Ballot or the Bullet" as it articulates the purpose. The slogan discusses liberty; to either be free or to die trying. The purpose of the text is introduced evidently at the beginning of the extract, "Black nationalism is a self-help philosophy",  in which is then emphasised in the subsequent sentences. The emphasis is conducted through the use of Anaphora, " You can...You can...You can" by which is used to elucidate the inclusivity that black Americans are provided when it comes to black nationalism. After that, the importance of Black nationalism is further re-instated, "if you are black and you not thinking black at this late date, well I'm sorry for you." in which creates a bandwagon appeal towards the audience of black Americans. This is done to evoke the members of the viewers, that may not be vocal activists that are actively fighting for their rights, to feel left out and old-fashioned. Thus making them feel the need to become a better influencer in this civil rights movement by voting for who is the best option for them; which aforementioned is one of the major subjects that Malcolm X is trying to persuade his audience in doing. After that, the speaker goes on to further illustrate the ease of his ideologies through the use of anadiplosis in the statement, "Once you change your philosophy, you change your thought pattern. Once you change your thought pattern, you change your attitude. Once you change your attitude, it changes your behaviour pattern, and then you go on into some action." In contrast to his earlier use of a bandwagon appeal, Malcolm X now directs his audience through clear steps that should be taken, using repetition is used to ensure that what was said is memorable and has resonance on the targeted viewers.


Aforementioned, this remarkable speech had left many of its audience members affected and called them to action by motivating them. An intrinsic part of why this speech was so successful is due to how Malcolm X uses the contextual properties of the issue on hand to help drive the purpose throughout the speech. Which can be seen in the second paragraph as it begins with a logos rhetoric by which the speech giver is referencing real world events in order provide validation and enlighten his audience by allowing them to see that his goal is achievable. "people in Africa and Asia are getting their independence." Malcolm X counteracts his earlier statement by providing the audience with his opinion as to why their actions of public marches would not gain them independence."They're not getting it by singing 'We Shall Overcome'" but instead makes a foil statement, in which he brings up measures that are the opposite of his resolutions to emphasise the effectivity of his resolutions. The author here is allowing the audience to follow along with him by connecting themselves through popular culture references such as the prior statement. The use of popular cultural knowledge is utilised once again later in the same paragraph where Malcolm X compares "Second class citizenship" to "20th-century slavery."  This comparison is made through the use of anaphora from lines 28-30 that help explain how Americans although not literal colonisers but are in fact a "hypocritical colonial power". Which Malcolm X then makes a swift transition into a hypophora to clarify his prior statement, "What do you call second-class citizenship? Why, that's colonisation." In the last paragraph the author makes another popular culture reference in which he alludes to “Uncle Tom”, Harriet Beecher Stowe’s character, to emphasise and explain their awareness of their own lower-class status due to their race. The combination of all of these literary devices is used to lead his audience along with his ideologies, simplifying it into a step-like process to quickly persuade the audience into buying into his claims, in which he finishes with a hypophora to finalise through a sense of objective.


Previously established in the context of the speech, the themes vacillate throughout, where the major themes of the subject are repeatedly referenced, those themes being: Black nationalism, colonialism, and change. Which are all exemplified through Malcolm X’s use of literary devices that both enhance the themes and consolidate them. Such as his use of epiphora from lines 15-18, repeating the word “sit” in different instances to compare the audience’s in which do not vocalise their activism to elders, chumps, and other in hopes to elicit actions from his audience. Which is used as a persuasive strategy to call his targeted audience to action and thus utilising literary devices to develop his themes in order to drive his purpose throughout the text.


As this was a persuasive political speech, the speech giver demonstrated an informative, instructional register in his tone. This is evident in his recurring use of the logos rhetoric that implements both statistics and historical references “The freedom of 22 million Afro-Americans here in this country… for the past  400 years”. Such references are put into practice in order to validate his clauses and calls to action. Moreover, this speech is proposing to a variety of black Americans, at a time where the ethnic group weren’t all granted adequate education. Meaning that the use of the abovementioned popular culture tropes is done to resonate with the audience and calls to informing the audience through both scholarly back-ups as well as cultural references to keep all of the members of the audience in the loop. This approach leads the audience to an influential state, one in which allows them to feel liberated as someone is finally fighting for their best interest, furthermore the audience are enabled to access an enlightening.  Moreover, the audience is told their situation bluntly and brutally, “He made a chump out of you. He made a fool out of you. He made you think you were going somewhere and you end going nowhere but between Lincoln and Washington.” This statement is told using anaphora to appeal to the audience’s need to aggress; Malcolm X believed that if the government continues to block full African American equality, then violence might become necessary. This all works towards setting an imperative mood, where the audience is advised. Malcolm X’s didactic approach to his speech through the use of statistics and cultural/historical references informs his purpose of influencing the audience to make the right decisions.


The stylistic use of repetition, rhetoric, persuasive appeals, statistics and other persuasive advances, which were previously mentioned, are used to progress the structure. An arrangement in which drives the speech’s purpose throughout explicit paragraphs. Such stylistic choices drive audiences to take action in order to demand equal African American rights. The structure of this text follows traditional political and persuasive speech conventions.

In order to appreciate this speech's effectivity, one must understand all the various kinds of devices used to prosecute this text. The major reason as to why The Ballot or the Bullet has become one of the strongest examples of a political speech is due to the Malcolm X’s efficient stylistic choices. This political speech exemplifies the use of rhetorical devices, figurative techniques such as alliteration, analogies and more, making references to real world events, as well as appealing to its audience's needs. The abovementioned conventions of the political speech were greatly employed by Malcolm X, in order to evoke a sense of urgency in his audience and eventually call them to action in order to gain equal rights.

Wednesday, 15 March 2017

IOC



IOC:

https://soundcloud.com/shamsa-ala/ioc-act-1-scene-4

Sunday, 12 March 2017

Power in Corilanus

Power is potentially the theme that Shakespeare, the author, had explored the most in this play. It is a dominant motif in Coriolanus, by which is a play that has never been deemed successful. This is solely due to the complex take on power and politics. Shakespeare immensely develops the action in the play made through abrupt political withdrawals in which never add up to formulate a satisfaction or resolution. The majority of audience misperceive this as a lack of precision on behalf of Shakespeare's writing and a lack of attention to plot development. This, in fact, can be ruled as completely the opposite of what the author does in this political play.

Shakespeare developed Coriolanus dependant of the current political climate in the context of 17th century England. The play portrays the intense sceptical that the play's context has on both democracy and heroism. Through the ethical battle that develops within the plot, between traditional politics and newfound democracy. Power is first prescribed in the play through the perspective of the plebians, people in which lack it. We are introduced to power on a grand scale, the audience is prompted with power dynamics within this society. In which develops immensely leading up to the climaxes of the play. 

We then are introduced to the actual holders of power within the plays sociopolitical context, characters such as Menenius, the Tribunes, Caius Martius, Volumnia and Aufidius. Initially, the first time the audience is met with these characters they're futures are foreshadowed immediately through both direct and indirect characterizations. The audience is enabled to understand the spectrum of power in this society. Those in which have power due to their quantity such as the plebians, warrior and demi-godly power such as Coriolanus, eloquent and persuasive power such as Menenius, or Aufidius and Volumnia's political and democratic power. 

All of these characters are significant explorations of power, in which the author tries to entail all the different kinds power. This is done by Shakespeare to intentionally display the uprise of democracy in opposition to traditional power in his world; to finally make a statement. A statement by which the author parallels to Englands political climate and displays that the most efficient power in their modern age is what is regarded as political power. This type of authority is heavily characterised by the play by the characters of Aufidius and Volumnia. Who commonly share the trait of being able to make decisions independently from their emotions. Volumnia is established as a woman who is willing to put her son through anything to result in a noble ending. Furthermore, Aufisius deviates from pride and is willing to give Coriolanus the short-lived glory as a leader of the Volscian army to achieve his goals in the long run. Both of these characters succeed, at the end of the play Volumnia is titled Rome's saviour, and Aufidius kills Coriolanus. These characters ability to manoeuvre in politics and their patience allows for them to triumph. These powerful results are implemented by the author to display, not necessarily the kindest or the noblest type of power, but instead the kind of power that lasts. Ultimately, Shakespeare presents that change and flexibility are effective in politics. 



Sunday, 26 February 2017

What is Shakespeare’s larger purpose in his characterisation of Coriolanus in Act I?

Coriolanus was one of Shakespeare's last plays, in which was set in the time of Ancient Rome; when Rome was still a small city/tribe, just before the rise of the Republic. Throughout the play, Shakespeare mirrors his current English political contexts; by which was the authoritarian rule of King James the first (1603-1625). Thus resulting the play to densely address sociopolitical issues and emphasising on the ones that occur between the different classes in society, in Coriolanus' case the plebian and the patricians. Due to this setting, Act 1 profusely operates as the basis and establishes the entire plays. The characters are presented, and through them, the external conflicts are acquainted. Shakespeare indirectly characterises Coriolanus' struggle in augmenting power trough his lack of emotional intelligence when he approaches the lower classes; using his lack of verbal self-control to symbolise it. Illustrating Coriolanus' lack of political insight strives towards a larger goal, which is the illustration of a parallel between Coriolanus and King Jame the first. 

Shakespeare introduces the setting of the play through rebellion, in Act 1, tThis scene is where the Roman plebians are revolting against the patricians. Displaying the plebians disadvantages and society and how the higher class react towards them, the men in power being: Coriolanus, the protagonist,  and Menenius, his foil character. The audience is introduced to these two contrasting characters through direct and indirect characterizations. Coriolanus is exhibited as the ''chief enemy to the people' in Act 1, Scene 1. The audience is introduced to the first conflict of the play; where Coriolanus is initially presented through the plebian's hateful perspectives, inscribing him as the primary cause of their societal issues. Shakespeare does so to set up the first actual appearance of Coriolanus in the play. In this scene Coriolanus confronts the plebians and displays his hostility towards the lower class, mocking them, giving the reader insight into Coriolanus' irritable and stubborn traits.  In opposition, the author then presents Menenius, who is referenced as the ‘one that hath always loved the people’ in Act I, Scene I. Unlike Coriolanus, Menenius is an honoured man in his society due to his eloquentness and present his beliefs and thoughts in such attractive manners to the public. His shrewd characterises, and use of language appeases the plebians, although he too is a patrician. Shakespeare does so intentionally to emphasise Coriolanus' attributes, by presenting him with a foil character. Which also foreshadows the inevitable and tragic death of Coriolanus.

There is then an abrupt transition from the protagonist's place in politics, and the author puts him on a battlefield. Contrastingly, in the battlefield, Coriolanus is completely respected and is even perceived as un-human but instead god-like, a demi-god. He is portrayed as a brave warrior and the saviour of the people that is recognised by everybody, showing the audience both Coriolanus' arrogant side as well as his courageous role. 

Once we reach the end of the play, Shakespeare shapes two completely different sides to the protagonist taking him from an ill-mannered politician to a godly figure in the battlefields. Moreover, Shakespeare draws allusions throughout the play between Coriolanus and King James the first and overall political stances. 





Saturday, 11 February 2017

belle hooks

"For in the incorrect usage of words, in the incorrect placement of words, was a spirit of rebellion that claimed language as a site of resistance. Using English in a way that ruptured standard usage and meaning, so that white folks could often not understand black speech, made English into more than the oppressor’s language." belle hooks

             Harriet Tubman was an African-American abolitionist that was born into slavery. Tubman was one of the many slaves that escaped and after that went on missions to help rescue enslaved families. She did this through using a network of secret routes and safe houses, named the Underground Railway, that was established in the United States during the 1800s that allow African American slaves to escape into free states and neighbouring countries, with the help of abolitionists and allies. Secret messages in the form of quilt patterns aided slaves escaping the bonds of captivity in the Southern states before and during the American Civil War.

It was illegal for slaves to be literate. Therefore they lacked the ability to read or write. Thus allowing codes to become their means of communication, whether it was oral or drawn and sewn. They played a vital role in the slaves' lives as it was what lead them throughout their route to freedom. That is why these codes are often referred to as Underground Railroad Quilt Clothes. 'Quilt' relates to the fact that most of these codes were sewn into quilts that were used as undetected banners. But these codes came in forms of dance, spirituals, code words and even phrases in which were taught and memorised within the slave community; allowing themselves to communicate in a way that their white slave owners couldn't decipher. Secrecy was the only way that the blacks could protect themselves from the whites; becoming characteristic to their culture. Where even the youngest of children were taught to effectively keep secrets from any strangers or members of society that didn't come from their family to preserve their safety. 

A characteristic of the African-American culture was developed at this time, where communication of enigmas through the use of ordinary, everyday objects; the objects are seen so often they are no longer noticeable by the white Americans and slave masters. This characteristic transcended and subsequently became applied to slave songs, using code words the slaves were able to efficiently communicate indirectly with each other and aid each other to escape.

The primary text that I will be using is an underground railway slave song, “Follow the Drinking Gourd”, which abovementioned were songs sung by abolitionists to help inform each other through codes about their circumstances, or what to expect. This song insinuated the act of escaping in the springtime, as the days got longer, and the sun returned and contrasted with the winter weather “When the sun comes back “. The song then goes on to refer to quails, ”the first quail calls” which begin to call/mate each other at the beginning of spring. The drinking gourd, a water dipper that is stated in the song refers back to a code name for the Big Dipper, the constellation that pointed to the Pole star towards the North. “The Dead Trees show you the way” is a line in the song that refers to moss, as it grows n the north side of dead trees. Thus was used as an indicator for directions in case the Big Dipper was invisible.

These slave songs use of the black vernacular (which implemented AAVE on a larger scale in society)  allows us insight into how the placement of words, was used as a spirit of rebellion by the slaves in America in the 1800s that claimed language as a state of resistance. Using English in a way that ruptured the standard usage and meaning of the words; creating codes so that white people were left with a lack of understanding. Ultimately making English into more than the oppressor’s language. Instead, threading their own history and characteristics into it to rebel and protests for their rights.

“Follow the Drinking Gourd”
Follow the drinking gourd,
Follow the drinking gourd,
For the old man is waiting for to carry you to freedom
If you follow the drinking gourd
When the sun comes back and the first quail calls,
Follow the drinking gourd.
For the old man is waiting for to carry you to freedom
If you follow the drinking gourd
The riverbank will make a very good road.
The dead trees show you the way,
Left foot, peg foot traveling on,
Follow the drinking gourd.
The river ends between two hills,
Follow the drinking gourd.
There’s another river on the other side,
Follow the drinking gourd.
Where the great big river meets the little river,
Follow the drinking gourd.
The old man is waiting for to carry you to freedom,
If you follow the drinking gourd.

Tuesday, 24 January 2017

Sunday, 15 January 2017

What is the value of preserving indigenous languages?

Language is the key to culture. Humans derive their social lives and all of their customs and traditions through the means of language. Due to its role as a communicator between people, it becomes intertwined with the traditions and customs, almost inseparable; language comes hand in hand with culture. With these truths, humans tend to be protective of their values and culture and thus makes us feel as though we are indebted to our language and what it has done for our individual cultures. Even when societies begin involuntarily become ignorant towards their cultures due to the modern day, your mother tongue will always be a constant reminder of the values and virtues your people were brought up by thus proving its significance in our lives. Showing that language tends to be the last string that binds a modernised nation back to its roots. Hence instilling the need of preserving our languages.

Once modern languages such as English begin to evoke a sense of replacing one's native tongue, it also starts to evoke the feeling of replacing your cultures entire history. 7000 languages are spoken in the world today, and 5000 of them are spoken by indigenous tribes; which makes the 6% total of the world's population. Unfortunately, 90% of the 5000 languages are near extinction. Meaning that 4500 languages are dying out in the modern world, taking all of their cultures histories, autonomy, power, heritage, and connectivity. In addition to all of these losses, we lose cultures worth of artistry and scholar. All of which impacts our modern explorations. Without such connections to thousands of tribes explorations, our modern world is missing out on so much.

An example of this would be the knowledge that was lost on the Pacific coast in the nations and tribes of Polynesia. Their culture originates from the ancient voyagers that travelled the oceans. Three thousand years ago there was an abrupt halt of long-distant voyaging for a thousand years, and all the knowledge of voyaging had gone with the people's ancestors. It took their people a millennium to regain any knowledge that they previously had on voyaging. There are many instances where such cultural traditions were mysteriously put to a stop, and couldn't be rediscovered again due to a lack of records through oral or written language. This insights us to the possibility of losing such valuable cultural knowledge alongside custom explorations if there was no preservation of the languages that indigenous people spoke, both physically (in writing) and oral (spoken).

There are huge consequences that come with being ignorant towards indigenous languages. therefore we need to become more aware of all of these languages and the worth they have to our modern world, and what we could learn from them.